Court rules Anwar doesn't have to appear in court
Media reported today the Kuala Lumpur High Court has set aside a subpoena requiring Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim to appear as a witness in a RM30 million civil suit filed by 12 people against businessman Datuk Seri Vinod Balachandra Sekhar and his wife, Winny Yeap.
The suit was filed in 2023 by 10 investors and two former employees of Vinod, who alleged misrepresentation, fraud and breach of contract.
Judicial commissioner Datuk Adam @ Edward Abdullah, in allowing Anwar’s application to set aside the subpoena issued on 15 January, ruled that the plaintiffs had failed to establish that the prime minister was a relevant and material witness to the proceedings.
“No useful purpose would be served by compelling his attendance. To do so would be oppressive and divert the trial from the real legal issues.
“The plaintiffs relied on photographs, social media posts and public appearances involving Anwar and Vinod.
“At their highest, such materials may demonstrate acquaintance or association, but they do not establish that the applicant possesses personal knowledge of the transactions pleaded. A relationship does not equate to materiality,” he said.
The court also said the issuance of a subpoena is not automatic and must be subject to judicial control.
“Otherwise, anyone mentioned in an email, photographed with a party or referred to in a conversation could be compelled to attend court. That is not the law,” FMT quoted Adam as saying.
Adam also noted that although the plaintiffs argued that Anwar’s name had been used to perpetrate fraud, their own witness acknowledged there was no evidence showing the prime minister’s name had been used to solicit investments or obtain funds.
“Therefore, the court allows the applicants’ application to set aside the subpoena,” he ruled, also ordering the plaintiffs to pay RM20,000 in costs to Anwar.
Lawyer Encik Sanjay Mohan appeared for the prime minister, while lawyer Encik Colin Andrew Pereira represented the plaintiffs.
The plaintiffs alleged that Vinod had persuaded them to invest, either personally or through his companies, without disclosing his alleged bankruptcy status.
They also alleged that concerns raised in an email dated 30 September, 2020, were dismissed by Vinod, who allegedly stated that a person named “Anwar” would resolve the matter, leading them to believe the reference was to the prime minister.
End©Permadu
| By Fauzi Kadir Chief Editor
|
Final editing and brought to you by Fauzi Kadir CHIEF EDITOR |
(Semua Hak Cipta Terpelihara)
PUBLISHED UPON APPROVAL BY THE EDITORIAL BOARD
PVisiting Permadu Malaysia is absolutely free and we operate with non-profit making objective. We hope you enjoy and feel happy visiting and reading every presentation from us.
If you have the generosity to support our operations and continuous activities of charity to those who are less fortunate, we would be grateful to accept sincere contributions from any individuals or organisations.
Contact us at permadu@gmail.com for further details and information. No obligation and no commitment.
Comments
Post a Comment