Criminal Court, Not Civil Court, Senior Federal Counsel Tells High Court

The High Court in Kuala Lumpur was told that the application by former finance minister Tun Daim Zainuddin and his wife, Toh Puan Na'imah Abdul Khalid, to strike out the charge made against them for failing to declare their assets should have been made in the Criminal Court and not in the Civil Court, national news agency Bernama reported today.

Senior Federal Counsel (SFC) Encik Liew Horng Bin said if the application to quash the charge was heard in the Civil Court through a judicial review, all evidence related to the case would be revealed in the court concerned.

"Therefore the application to quash the charge should be made in the Criminal Court. The application to stay proceeding (of a criminal case) should be done in the relevant (criminal) court," he said during the online proceeding today, Tuesday February 27, before Judge Datuk Wan Ahmad Farid Wan Salleh.

Also at the proceeding was lawyer Encik Mervyn Lai, representing Daim and Na'imah.

The court then ordered the parties involved to file additional submissions before or on March 1.

Earlier, Liew told the court that he did not object to the application by Daim and Na'imah to amend several paragraphs in their application for leave to initiate a judicial review against the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission's (MACC) investigation against them.

The amendment is about the notice served under Section 36 (1) of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) Act 2009 to Daim and Na'imah.

Daim, 85, Nai'mah, 66, and their four children, Asnida, 62, Md Wira Dani, 45, Muhammed Amir Zainuddin, 28, and Muhammed Amin Zainuddin, 25, and Ilham Tower Sdn Bhd had applied for the leave last January 10.

They named MACC and the public prosecutor as the first and second respondents.

On January 16, the application for leave was heard before Justice Encik Wan Ahmad Farid Wan Salleh who fixed March 4 to deliver his ruling.

Last January 29, Daim was charged in the Sessions Court here with failing to comply with a notice to declare his assets, which include several luxury vehicles, companies and properties in Kuala Lumpur, Selangor Pahang, Negeri Sembilan, Perak and Kedah.

Earlier, on January 23, Na’imah was charged in the same Sessions Court with failing to comply with a notice by not declaring her property including Menara Ilham and several properties around Kuala Lumpur and Penang.

The appearance and act on the above video are for illustration purpose only.

End©Permadu


Adaptation by Fauzi Kadir
Chief Editor

Assistant Editor
Nazura Othman


Final editing and brought to you by
Fauzi Kadir CHIEF EDITOR

© 2023 Permadu Harmony Bersepadu
(Semua Hak Cipta Terpel
ihara)
All Rights Reserved 
E-mail: permadu@gmail.com

(DILULUSKAN UNTUK SIARAN OLEH LEMBAGA SIDANG PENGARANG
PUBLISHED UPON APPROVAL BY THE EDITORIAL BOARD  

Comments

POPULAR POSTS from Permadu Malaysia

MAHATHIR MAY REJOIN UMNO

Di sebalik misteri kehilangan Anita Sarawak

OVERCONCENTRATION OF A MALAY POPULATION MAKES SHAH ALAM A GHOST CITY, SAYS ANALYST

Isu Stadium Shah Alam, suami Hannah Yeoh dapat kontrak, parkir, terkini babi — faktor penyumbang PH kalah di PRN akan datang

Janganlah jealous lelaki Rohingya dapat awek Melayu cun💝

OGY MASALAH KEWANGAN, TAKKAN BIG BOSS PN TAK BOLEH TOLONG KOT

Azam Baki Berpotensi Menjadi Salah Satu Punca Kejatuhan Anwar

Syukri Razab Presiden Parti Bersama Malaysia

LOKMAN TELLS AG: CHARGE MEN IN SEX VIDEO OR FACE OUR LAWSUIT

Bersama expected to win half of PKR, DAP and Amanah's existing parliamentary and state seats in Johor