Court will hear Liew’s application to appoint trustees to manage the RM33m judgment sum
.png)
The High Court said the police investigations into Pastor Raymond Koh’s abduction were never conducted in a meaningful manner over the past eight years, Ho Kit Yen wrote for FMT today.
Justice Datuk Su Tiang Joo, in his full judgment, stated that the police officers involved disregarded their statutory duties under the law to safeguard public life and security, as well as to prevent and detect crime.
He highlighted that in Koh’s case, the pastor’s wife, Puan Susanna Liew, faced obstacles in dealing with the police from the outset.
The court noted that Liew, police officer Datuk Ali Asra Abu Bakar and investigating officer Encik Supari Muhammad testified that the questions posed to her focussed on proselytisation, which Koh was allegedly involved in, rather than questions aimed at identifying leads.
The court also noted that the presence of one Encik Saiful Bahri Abdul Aziz’s Toyota Vios (seen at the scene of Koh’s abduction) was never pursued as a lead until it was revealed during the 2017 Suhakam inquiry.
“The court took into consideration the (police’s) conduct after the abduction – concealment of information, misdirection of inquiries, and failure to pursue obvious investigative leads.
“These omissions were not neutral. Rather, they suggest involvement of individuals who either possessed direct knowledge or had reason to protect those responsible.”
The judge also noted that a man, Encik Lam Chang Nam, was subsequently charged with “kidnapping” Koh while the inquiry was ongoing. The charge was later withdrawn.
“Although the power to prosecute lies with the public prosecutor (attorney-general), the operational role of the police in presenting evidence cannot be overlooked.
“The timing of the charge and subsequent withdrawal suggest that it (Lam’s case) was used to achieve an ulterior objective, which was to disrupt the inquiry,” Su added.
Last month, the court ruled in favour of Liew and ordered the government and the police to pay more than RM37 million to Koh’s family over the state’s involvement in his abduction.
The court ordered RM33 million to be entered against the government for the “wrongful acts” committed against Koh.
However, the funds must be kept in a trust fund and cannot go directly to Liew and her three children.
An additional RM4 million in general and aggravated damages was also awarded to Liew.
State involvement
Su said the classified task force report reinforced the point that Koh’s disappearance was similar to that of activist Encik Amri Che Mat.
“Both (chairman) Encik Abd Rahim Uda and (member) Encik Zamri Yahya testified that they considered it likely Amri and Koh’s disappearances involved the same operational unit.
“The consistency between Suhakam’s and the task force’s findings bolsters the plaintiff’s case that a Special Branch unit orchestrated or facilitated the operation,” he added.
Meanwhile, the court will hear Liew’s application to appoint trustees to manage the RM33 million judgment sum – or RM10,000 a day – since Koh’s disappearance on 8 December.
Liew suggested appointing her solicitors to hold the judgment sum in trust or engaging either PB Trustee Services Bhd or Amanah Raya Bhd as trustees.
End©Permadu
| By Fauzi Kadir Chief Editor
|
| Final editing and brought to you by Fauzi Kadir CHIEF EDITOR |
(Semua Hak Cipta Terpelihara)
PUBLISHED UPON APPROVAL BY THE EDITORIAL BOARD
Visiting Permadu Malaysia is absolutely free and we operate with non-profit making objective. We hope you enjoy and feel happy visiting and reading every presentation from us.
If you have the generosity to support our operations and continuous activities of charity to those who are less fortunate, we would be grateful to accept sincere contributions from any individuals or organisations.
Contact us at permadu@gmail.com for further details and information. No obligation and no commitment.
.png)
Comments
Post a Comment